Emails Exposing Builders Capital, a National Private Lender Connected to The FBI in Money Laundering Schemes, Wrongdoings, Murder Case, Death Threats, Criminal Retaliation, Forced Labor, and More
The crimes come in the context of a large organized crime involving a pursuit case and personal narrative, discussed in this publication.
This article discuses a narrative relates to a CEO of a national private lender, Builders Capital in WA, namely Robert Trent, a Mafia leader who funnels money laundering activities through the company’s financial systems, is also involved in organized crimes and inciting for school shootings jointly with other associated Mob leaders.
This is one of the most brutal cases in history with no exaggeration. Evidence including email communications, text messages, artifacts and demonstratives are added.
This is not a disgruntled employee throwing unfounded accusations at the company. I am an ethical person with integrity and high values; and as much as I did not want to share these; however, the circumstances of the case forced me to publicize it. Disclaimers at the bottom.
It is imperative to view the information entailed in this article on the origins of the case and the development of the events prior going through the below in order to understand the complete picture.
Builders Capital (WA) practiced slavery on me, intentional hostility and abuse at work, paying me significantly low salary compared to the fair market value, my experience and the duties I was performing, wrongfully terminated my employment but also criminally retaliated against me in the most brutal ways after I attempted to sue them - to find that they are also in connection with a handful individuals on the personal level from my church in Seattle, WA who shared a mutual interest for an organized crime.
Not only, and when the CIA intervened, they retaliated by motivating for Robb Elementary School shooting and others as explained and evidenced in the below articles:
The Unspoken True Motives Behind Robb Elementary School Shooting
Evidence Against The FBI & Robert Trent For Their Responsibility in School Shootings in The U.S.
I used to hold a position of IT Systems Engineer at the company, carrying out simple tasks such as “keyboard is not working” up to the more complex and technically advanced integrations and implementations including data governance and compliance, maintaining the cloud systems reliability, security and uptime solely for over two years. I developed the company’s IT infrastructure and established standards for their IT systems, with thorough documentations, effectively shaping the department's identity. Despite this, I was let go. A comprehensive overview of my projects and experience at Builders Capital is referenced later in this article.
The last attempt of suing the company was made during my employment at Ford Motor Company in 2022 that was recently revealed as a CIA covert involvement in this video.
Due to the nature of my position, I had the highest level privileges and access on all the corporate accounts with access to sensitive data, essentially performing the duties of an IT Director of the company whereas given the title of IT Administrator on documents followed by Systems Engineer title change when I requested it.
Shortly after termination, I suddenly lost my ability to type on the keyboard and use the computer mouse properly which is the basic function of my job especially right after those attempts of suing the company; a retaliation in the most cruel ways, explained further below this article. The criminal retaliation also extends to death threats, harassments, cybercrime, gang-stalking and others.
The case is in fact much larger than an employment dispute, it involves the company’s CEO, Robert Trent (known as “Rob Trent”, pictured below) for employing the financial system of the company in money laundering schemes under the cover of loans, in addition to other crimes including bribery, human trafficking, modern slavery, motivating for mass shootings and others; ultimately being a mob leader who infiltrated the FBI that serves as a cover-up and protection on those activities. These are proven with evidence, consistent patterns, videos and other documented details.
I understand that if you know Robert, you probably think these are not true. I once thought of him to a good person or at least not to the point to be a mob leader. I also ask who might perceive this as rumors to factor the previously shared details and material as well as the totality of the circumstances.
The crimes stemming from the company’s corrupt leadership and their affiliated criminal parties are driven by evil and are extremely severe that negatively impacts the national security. A death sentence would be appropriate for them with no exaggeration.
While this article references Builders Capital, it is more focused on the company’s corrupt leadership; namely, Robert Trent (CEO), Beth Glein (COO), Salam Morcos (Principal Engineer), and others as further mentioned below.
Does the company not do business and provide legitimate loans to builders? They do, but they also have another stream of crimes and wrongdoings including money laundering funneled into the system.
Termination Event
I was terminated under duress on October 6, 2021, after being taken into the office of Robert Trent (CEO), where I felt as if I was being detained. Following my unlawful termination, the company had to recruit for my position by posting 4 to 5 IT job openings. Additionally, there were several rapid promotions given to the employee who witnessed my closed-office termination and entrance into the office, namely Mallory Randazzo (pictured below). I’m not accusing Mallory, I’m just stating what happened.
The Explanation of Termination Event Document explains further details surrounding my termination event. While the termination event dates back to 2021 however the case and the crimes are continuing to this date with significant escalations.
Wrongdoing Highlights
Money Laundering
Intentional Purge of Corporate Data and Departing Employees
Un-consented Call Recordings
Forced Labor, Bait and Switch Hirings
H1B Visa Fraud
Intent of Forge and Fraud
Pay Discrimination
Non-Payment of Severances
Termination Under Duress
Criminal Retaliation Highlights
Threats and Harassments Including Death Threats
Gang-Stalking
Extortion
Cybercrime and Surveillance
Identity and PII Theft, Money Theft
Funds were stolen from my Business Bank of America account.Neural Torture and Abuse
Inability to type on the keyboard or use the mouse is performed through neural abuse ultimately leading to slavery, explained in details, backed with videos, evidence, CT scans, governmental resources and registered patents. A covert form of modern slavery and human torture.Motivating for Mass Shootings
As stated previously, they motivated for Robb Elementary School shooting and others as a retaliatory action that was pre-planned against the involved authority as explained and evidenced in the articles referenced above.
Robert Trent - CEO
Robert was my manager since my start date at the company in August 2019 and until around May 2021.
Salam Morcos - Principal Engineer
Originally from Iraq, moved to Canada, then to USA in 2020 when Builders Capital sponsored him for the position of a Principal Engineer. He was hired at Builders Capital under the claim of establishing the Broker Portal for the company and maintaining its proprietor Loan Management System but that turned out to not be the case exactly, further explained in this article and the other published articles.
He was alleged to be referred to the company by his sister-in-law, Marie Henry (pictured below), a friend of mine from the Church who also referred me to the job at the company. Marie is a member of the Coptic Orthodox Church and Community in Seattle, WA; the community that I’m also part of - but again, that’s not quite the exact story in regards to his employment referral to the company.
Salam became my manager for around less than a year at Builders Capital after the company has hired him in around March 2021.
Beth Glein - COO
Beth, Chief Operating Officer is one of the key individuals who committed intentional hostility against myself in the work environment with Robert Trent’s blessings, further explained and demonstrated below.
Ken Trent - Chief of Growth
Ken, Robert Trent's brother, played a crucial role in the offenses, even though he joined the company shortly after my dismissal and that I didn’t interact with him. He is currently the President of BIM Quote, a subsidiary of Builders Capital, having previously held the position of Chief of Growth for Builders Capital, which he assumed about a month after my termination in November 2021.
Criminal Retaliation After Termination
I first started realizing the criminal retaliation by the company through implications shortly after attempting to sue them through different attorneys during my employment at Ford that I started a few months after my termination, on Feb 2022.
The start of the implications was also aligned on the exact date where the EEOC claims process was closed. After several months going through the events of the case, I came to a realization that the organized crime was planned beforehand with some individuals on my personal level who shared a mutual interest in an organized crime.
The case led to further discovering in connection with the national security that uncovered the FBI’s role in backing those crimes, essentially acting as the facilitator of intelligence capabilities to Robert Trent and others involved through bribery while blessing on them with overruling powers.
Cybercrime on My Personal Dropbox
I uploaded the lawsuit-related documents on my personal Dropbox account and sent them to the attorney I spoke with to sue the company, which included the explanation of termination event as well as other agreements. Attorney: Lana Floyd, ELM Law in WA.
In Oct 2021, post my termination and during the 1-month transition period where I was supposed to answer questions by the company in regarding to IT to facilitate the transition over to other employees, David Pollack (“Dave Pollack”, pictured below), the newly hired IT employee at that time, has sent me a text message asking me to forward him the MFA (multi-factor authentication) code for Dropbox that I received to my phone.
I assumed in good faith that the Dropbox account that David was referring to belongs to the company and had my phone number registered for MFA; hence, I provided him with the code. However, given the circumstances of the case that were discovered later from that message, it seems that it was another cybercrime event to pass through the second layer of authentication and login to my personal Dropbox account after maliciously obtaining the password that had the files relevant to the lawsuit I attempted to file. Dropbox MFA text messages do not include a reference to the account email ID that the code was being sent for.
The below text communications with timestamps (pacific) explain and confirm on the breach. First message (shown below) was received from David Pollack at 4:34 PM.
I received the first Dropbox MFA code at 4:35 PM.
Forwarded the code to David at 4:36 PM.
Received another message from Dropbox with a new code at 4:39 PM which is an indication to another login attempt on the account, it could be the same account or a different one.
Forwarded the second code to David at 4:40 PM.
Received a text message from David Pollack at 4:40 PM alleging that he is not receiving my messages.
I then responded back at 4:41 PM asking him to email me at my personal email address.
Sent email to David attaching the same Dropbox codes at 4:47 PM.
David replied back to my email confirming that he was able to login at 4:49 PM, that was after I sent them via email.
Evidence 1 on The Cybercrime
Based on David’s response, he was able to login to the Dropbox account after I sent him the MFA codes over email at 4:47 PM, 7 minutes later after receiving the second MFA code to the Dropbox account which should have automatically invalidated the code due to expiry duration being 5 minutes. How was David able to use that code then as he claimed in that email?
I'm not directly accusing David for the cybercrime; I recognize that he might have been pressured into it.
It is likely that David received those SMS text messages I received and forwarded to him. With the first one could be belonging to the company’s Dropbox account whereas the second one belonged to my personal Dropbox account and he was able to use both in authenticating, but then claimed that he wasn’t receiving my SMS messages as an attempt of maneuvering from why he asked for the second code when he could use the first one to authenticate already and there would have not been a need for re-authentication with another code. He just didn’t account for the expiration interval of the MFA code. I recall also that I changed the registered phone number on the company’s Dropbox account on my termination date over to Robert Trent.
Evidence 2 on The Cybercrime
The reinforcing proof on that cybercrime is that when I requested the access logs from Dropbox, they provided me with only 6 month worth of login history up to one day after the above which was Dec 3rd, 2021 even though my request was submitted in May 2022 and the logs were exported on May 31st, 2022 which makes the six months that Dropbox indicated should have been dated back to November 31st, 2021 not December 3rd, offsetting one day from the suspected logins on Dec 2nd, 2021, that is presuming that’s the maximum back-dated range the company is able to generate even though it is not convincing. It appears that Dropbox intended to provide me with those logs one day after from David requested the MFA codes. Another example on the wrongdoing and the abuse of powers.
Dropbox Email (May 31, 2022, 2:33 AM PST)
Below is the email received from Dropbox with the login history.
And the below is the original request I submitted to Dropbox.
Does a large company like Dropbox really retain only 6 months worth of logs? Companies with that size usually have data retention policies for at least 2 years if not 7 years for legal and compliance purposes.
Furthermore, Dropbox did not mention in that email if 6 months is the maximum allowed date range by the system, they put it vague and just mentioned 6 months that were still missing a few days.
FBI Vanishes
Interesting that I’m threading these with such details, meanwhile the FBI are not doing anything for over two years based on my several submitted reports to the bureau indicating a large scale cybercrimes and a national security threat, the crimes are continuing to this date and the bureau seems to be non-existent.
Doesn't the aforementioned clearly suggest a cybercrime?
Google Account
Similarly, Robert Trent reached out to me via SMS, requesting MFA codes for Google, claiming they were related to the company. While I was receiving notifications for those messages, I did not open or view their content, and despite updating the MFA phone registrations on the company's accounts to Robert Trent on October 6th and 7th, 2021, and giving him a printed copy of the MFA backup codes, I still shared the MFA code I received from Google at that time in good faith when he requested.
It appears that Robert Trent violated the covenant good faith and fair dealing by tricking me into sending MFA codes for accounts including Google and Dropbox which he claimed belonged to the company advantaging the transition agreement that the company forced me to sign on.
In reality, these accounts were used to gain unauthorized access to my personal accounts after stealing my passwords, create accounts under my name (impersonation), and engage in malicious impersonation communications. That is in addition to the further cybercrimes occurring on all my devices until current.
It is important to highlight that when I provided Robert Trent, David Pollack, and the company with the requested MFA codes, I had no access to or valid passwords for the company's accounts. I also remember noticing that David Pollack was no longer with the company around 4 months after my termination. He used to be a connection on my LinkedIn but it appears that he has blocked me.
The “Buying More Time” Concept
This specific example in regards to “data expiry” in regards with log exports and date ranges is a proof to the concept of “buying more time” until we can claim that it’s too late for the evidence to be obtained - from their perspective.
If they are successful in preventing the victim from pursuing or delaying any formal proceedings to gather evidence that could hold them accountable, even though most of records are retained for at least 7 years, they are not only abusing their powers and employing threats to force a halt on such proceedings, but they can also claim that they do not oppose the export of data. However, the responsible facility or company may be unable to conduct that export due to the expiration of the logs or data in question. Furthermore, their intention may be to exceed the statute of limitations, which typically ranges from three to five years according to my understanding. In this case, such limitation shall not apply.
The above example is a good demonstration for that but in this case of Dropbox, the submitted request came a little bit earlier to them that they had to include an omitted copy of the records regardless. This can apply to anything ranging from security camera’s footages, logs, emails, data and/or any other artifacts. Nevertheless, as mentioned priorly, such data should be and is being retained by systems for at least 7 years based on the commonly agreed on compliance policies.
Money Laundering
Accounting Reconciliation Disparities
As some of my duties included manual review of some emails that were flagged as a potential spam, I came across several emails where my eyes felt on comments being made from accounting staff in regard to accounting records are un-matching indicating “plugging some random numbers” for the reconciliations to work, which raised a concern about money laundering over the transparency of those transactions between the Loan Management System and the Banks. Below is a screenshot for a relevant email. This was not the only time that I come across a similar context.
I recall that such email was made after Builders Capital mass terminated around 4 of its accounting employees which was before COVID for reasons I did not understand. Those mass terminations also followed the resignation (as it was communicated) of Sachin Latawa, CFO and his wife, Shikha Kothari (accountant) who brought a large lawsuit case against the company in a later date.
The above email was addressed to Michele Fualii who is not even employed with the company. Michele is an Accounting Controller at an affiliated company, Hadley Properties, and is neither contracted nor employed by Builders Capital. Nevertheless, the company is allowing Michele to access its accounting data, accounts, banks, and other sensitive systems.
Similarly, Robert Trent has appointed another Accounting Controller at his company, "RTI" (Robert Trent Investments), named Kathy Dawson and not officially employed with Builders Capital to be responsible for handling Builders Capital's financial data and possesses the highest level of access to the company's bank accounts, NetSuite, and other sensitive information.
Why would a company let a non-employee who is officially employed at a different company perform such duties unless there is an intent of malicious fraudulent activities and such shady employments that aim to maneuver from the accountability and auditing?
In fact, it has always seemed that the company intends to create a mess in regards to accounting for defrauding auditing and malicious intents while blaming such mess on the mass termination of the accounting employees. Remind me, why did you terminate them in the first place?
Forfeitance of Accounting User Accountability
Builders Capital employs "Oracle NetSuite" as a primary financial vendors, which is programmatically linked to the company's proprietary loan management system, often referred to as "LMS."
During my employment as the company's sole IT personnel, I held the highest level of privileged access to all systems, yet Robert Trent ensured that he retained master admin privileges exclusively for himself. I witnessed that the company did not pay for dedicated NetSuite seats for each accounting user; instead, they used shared accounts for accounting activities, which diminished accountability among employees. For instance, an employee with a dedicated NetSuite license, such as John Smith (john.smith@builders-capital.com), might be required to share their login credentials with other accounting staff.
The accountants who work there may not necessarily be aware of the intentions behind such act by the company’s leadership. The company would justify this by claiming they were working on acquiring additional seats or trying to stay within budget due to the high cost of the licenses - meanwhile, they make millions of dollars.
The only time I gained master admin access to NetSuite was briefly after Sachin Latawa's (CFO, pictured below) termination, after which Robert Trent promptly changed the login credentials; therefore, I wasn’t able to secure proper licenses for each team member.
The same applied to banks logins. Actions like these seek to manipulate the system with unreasonable justifications when questions arise about who is accountable for certain responsibilities.
Mass Terminations of Accounting Staff
As explained above, the mysterious mass termination of the accounting staff was performed following Sachin’s termination who was their manager. The company had then hired temporary accountants through Robert Half.
With all the other events, it seemed as an attempt to cover-up on financial records that represent money laundering carried out by those temporary accountants while all sharing the same Netsuite login ID and they can just call it incorrect inputs from a non-experienced accountant staff if questioned.
The terminated employees included Hana Nguyen who’s mentioned in the above-included screenshot of email that is referencing “plugging in some random numbers” in regards to accounting reconciliations, in addition to JD Nguyen, Margaret Raihl, and Greg Packwood (pictured below respectively).
Question: when you create a shared or generic login on a financial system that is shared among a couple of accounting employees, you terminate them, you then hire temporary accountants who continue to use that shared login ID, lay them off then hire full-time accountants that continue to use and share that login ID; how are you able to track who did or is doing what and attribute accountability accordingly? You generate millions in revenue, meanwhile claim that you cannot afford a couple of extra licenses?
Automated Fake Loan Submissions
In around August 2021, I noticed that Google's reCAPTCHA is no longer operational, leading to the submission of loan applications and pricing requests without proper filtering and verification.
Once I became aware of this issue, I informed those involved in the loan system's development and maintenance, including Salam Morcos and Robert Trent.
However, despite the significance of this problem, it seemed that the company has shown a surprising lack of concern, allowing the reCAPTCHA to remain inactive despite it being a straightforward and easy process to complete, especially when I had already generated and provided them with the new reCAPTCHA keys to be integrated into the system's backend. It appears that the company have intentionally disabled Google's reCAPTCHA, assuming it would go unnoticed, while delaying a quick hotfix to enable the simulation of sufficient loan applications to facilitate their money laundering operations.
Non-Payment of Severances
One employee laid off during the mass layoffs due to COVID-19 was Ethan Toland (pictured below).
After Ethan’s termination, I contacted him to arrange for the return of the company laptop. Ethan, who was working remotely as a loan officer based in Texas, responded that he refused to send the laptop back because Robert Trent had promised him a $5,000 severance, which he claimed he never received. I then forwarded Ethan's email to Robert Trent so he could address the situation. As a result, I became a witness to the non-payment of promised severance packages, which Robert Trent acknowledged.
I recall searching for that email communication in my mailbox in a later date prior to my termination but I couldn’t find it. I didn't investigate further into why it was missing since I became occupied with other tasks. However, it appeared that the email had been intentionally removed from my mailbox.
Interistingly, following my termination and shortly after my discussions with HKM attorneys, the first attorney I reached out to in the beginning, Builders Capital announced on their LinkedIn page that Ethan Toland from Texas had been rehired. At that point, it seemed as though the company was attempting to appease Ethan and cover up its failure to pay severance.
In a similar situation, I witnessed email communications from another employee called Garrison Kickham who was working remotely from Texas (pictured below) complaining about not getting paid the promised salary during COVID when he was furloughed.
Below is the email thread and evidence.
Garrison was also under Eric Thomas’s (pictured below) team same as Ethan Toland.
A similar situation also happened with another laid-off loan officer named Erik Vanderweil (pictured below).
Erik was being managed by Mark Woodbridge, Builders Capital Sales Director with previous Army background (pictured below).
Erik was also refusing to return his company laptop until he was reimbursed for expenses he submitted. After several email communications, Mark eventually responded, referring to Erik's situation by stating, "he is basically holding the laptop hostage until he gets paid," or something to that effect, explicitly using the phrase "holding the laptop hostage." Below is the referenced email thread.
I also recall that part of Sachin’s (CFO) lawsuit case against the company involved non-payment of the promised severance package. Screenshot below from CaseText.
This is my testimony about the company’s wrongdoing led by the corrupt executives - now what? are they going to arrest me or should they react accordingly to those illegal acts? I’m looking to see a correspondent lawful swift action from the authorities including the FBI and IRS.
Arguments
Are they going to sue or press charges against me for publishing these when I consumed every way of obtaining justice but all lead to no where?
What are they going to say? They motivated for school shootings and others in the light of this case, that they are continuing to subject me to their crimes until this moment but they nevertheless want to sue me?
I think it's more appropriate for authorities like the FBI and the DOJ to investigate and convict them for such crimes, rather than placing judgment on a little victim like myself who resorted to the public for help when the bureau didn't fulfill its fundamental duty behind its existence of protecting the nation from threats like these as they always brag with. Isn't that what they refer to by "corruption"?
Where have you been in the past 2.5 years, FBI? It is clear that the severe corruption within the bureau and bribery is the primary factor for not conducting investigations against the reported crimes. However, I’m certain that there are still some loyal officials within the agency. Perhaps this is an opportunity for the FBI to restore the public trust in the bureau?
Disclaimer: The publishing of this article shall not lead to my conviction, lawsuit against me, arrest, or any similar unfair outcome or consequences; and such act shall be considered unlawful, an attempt to cover-up on the crimes and obstructing the gathering of statements from witnesses. I do not consider myself a keyboard warrior or similar, and I do respect the laws and regulations but I’m a victim in a case that requires the public attention and voice, especially when authorities are unable to assist.
Intentional Purge and Deletion of Corporate Data
Purge of Data Including Forensic Acquisitions
After transferring all of my files on the company’s cloud file sharing platform over to Robert Trent on my termination date which included several forensic acquisitions to devices and other important exports that included activity and access logs on the accounts generated from multiple systems that belonged to several employees who held sensitive positions or with a potential of being involved in legal ramifications including Jessica Corbett, Robert and Beth’s assistant, I noticed that those Data were gone shortly after transferring them over to Robert while he was asking me another question where I had to provide guidance to him on his computer. His facial expressions have changed upon noticing that I had noticed such purge act. That was not the first time I witness such deletion of data taking place by the company’s leadership.
Purge of Sachin Latawa’s (CFO) Mailbox
Shortly after Sachin’s resignation from the company (as it was communicated), he brought a lawsuit case against them which required performing several eDiscoveries such as Data Search, applying a litigation hold and export of related emails and data that belonged to Sachin during his period of employment. Upon receiving those requests from the legal department and attempting to generate the requested records, I found that only very few emails existed in Sachin’s mailbox that did not cover the requested eDiscovery format.
I was newly started with the company at that time and did not give it much thought why these data are not there or how come Sachin’s email contains only a few emails. He was the company’s CFO and it is expected for his mailbox to contain at least a few thousands email communications. It is worth noting that I provided a delegate access to Robert Trent and Beth Glein to Sachin’s mailbox after his resignation; additionally, Robert Trent had already master admin privilege on the company’s Microsoft tenant that had the mailboxes housed. It seems that the leadership intended to purge his messages from the system anticipating a lawsuit which was then brought against them.
Purge of The CEO and COO’s Assistant Mailbox
Jessica Corbett was the CEO and COO assistant. On Jessica Corbett's alleged resignation date, September 12, 2021, she handed me the keycards she'd received from the new Puyallup building (Benaroya) and returned her work-issued laptop. While I was revoking Jessica's access to work-related accounts and backing up her local computer data, as well as cloud files, I discovered that all items in her inbox had been deleted. I informed her manager, Beth, but she did not provide a coherent answer at that time.
I then placed an indefinite litigation hold on Jessica’s mailbox, account, and created a forensic image of her device, which I securely transferred to the company's cloud storage. A few days later, I informed Beth regarding such litigation hold and forensic acquisition. Beth’s facial expressions turned to be worried and did not comment. It appeared that she was not happy with those actions for some reason. Notably, Jessica had a delegate access to certain calendar items belonging to Beth Glein and Robert Trent on his separately owned company (RTI) as well Builders Capital due to her role as their assistant.
While I could have investigated the logs to confirm this, I opted not to due to time constraints, choosing instead to restore the deleted items and place the mailbox under litigation hold. However, considering other events I observed, including subsequent retaliatory actions post-termination and my interactions with Jessica, who seemed to have ethical integrity, it appeared that the deletion was intentionally carried out by Beth Glein, to whom I had granted delegated access to Jessica's mailbox upon her departure.
On a related note, I recall a brief conversation with Jessica that gave me the impression that she is a kind person. During our chat, I also learned that her husband is a fighter jet pilot in the Military.
Mass Deletions of Knowledgebase Articles
During my four-hour virtual meeting with Robert Trent, Salam Morcos, David Pollack, Austin Hughes on Oct 8th, 2021 after my termination to train them on the IT systems that I was overseeing at the company, I noticed that all the technical articles I crafted for the company that were published on Zendesk have all been deleted despite their accuracy.
Notably, all of these articles had my name and photo next to them as the publisher, but as with announcing my termination to all employees as a willful resignation instead of the truth, they had to purge any and all data that leaves a footprint in the company and may remind the employees of me.
And what backs my statement above is the jealousy sensed shortly after Richa, accounting manager responding to an email thread checking on a request while citing my advise I provided on a technical item in the past which was another reason that sped my termination after that email by a few days. Below is the referenced email.
The company's C-level executives - particularly, Beth Glein, and Salam Morcos are of that type that micromanages their teams and dislike it when employees build a broad rapport with other employees as this could lessen the spotlight on them and draw the attention away from them.
After everything I experienced during my time with the company, I was convinced that once my access was revoked, all my data would be erased which would prove the company's wrongdoings, hostile actions against me and contain communications about legal inquiries, complaints regarding Salam, salary negotiations, and so forth which could make them accountable if I opted to sue them.
Additionally, since Katherine Christofilis, the corporate attorney (pictured below) informed me that the company was pursuing legal action against Sachin Latawa following his resignation, I became fearful that they might do the same to me, erasing my data first and then suing me, leaving me without any proof or evidence to hold them responsible.
Witnessing such purge of data, non-payment of severance among other wrongdoings and hostility, left me in extreme worriness whether the company will retain my mailbox and data after my departure in attempt of getting away from accountability in the event of a lawsuit case is brought against them. In fact, I put an indefinite litigation hold on my mailbox as well as several other relatable mailboxes that could be involved in legal proceedings surrounding my case, but the question is:
Are these litigation holds still in place or have been lifted?
Is the company retaining my mailbox as is until current?
Is it tampered with or any form of deletion of communications have happened on it? Notably, I provided a delegate access to Robert Trent to my mailbox on my termination date; he has a master admin access to the tenant, nevertheless.
After Termination Training
Another atrocity by the company demonstrated in requiring me to conduct a four-hour virtual training session through Microsoft Teams just a day after my termination in which such ask I received after signing the termination agreement they had me to sign under undue influence and duress. At the peak of my grief, I ended up leading the training while I was in tears throughout the entire session. Below are the screenshots from the meeting invitation, sent from the conference room email ID that they were present in.
Interesting that I was required to lead a four-hour virtual meeting that provided comprehensive training to the Principal Engineer who supervised me, along with two other IT team members in addition to Robert Trent, the CEO - not only, but I was asked to remain on standby for a month after my termination to assist with any questions regarding the IT systems, and even after that period. This underscores the critical nature of my role and the systems I managed.
Additionally, at the beginning of the session, Robert Trent requested my approval to record the virtual meeting in which I granted. Given the unintentional and unlawful data purges I witnessed, I’m wondering if the company has retained the recording of the training session, whether they can present it in the event of a formal proceeding, or if it can be recouped if it was deleted.
More on Salam Morcos and Related Threats
During my interactions with Salam at the company, I noticed that he is not a genuinely good person, who verbally says something, puts something else in writing and does a completely different action that I reported him to Robert Trent while including Curt Altig (owner) in the email.
After my termination from Builders Capital, I was curious to learn about his background that I searched for Salam online, I then came across various content and articles published by him that expressed conflicting religious views and politically motivated content concerning political engagements and supporting campaigns of a democratic U.S. Congress Member that were made before him moving to the U.S. while being a Canadian citizen. Builders Capital sponsored him for the position in 2021.
Not only, his publicized religious views indicated that he was a “Militant Atheist” which is the complete opposite than what his sister-in-law, Marie Henry said about him converting from “Islam” to “Christianity” where he married her sister, Christine and obtained the last name “Morcos” from since it’s a Christian name - but, my interactions with him reflected a completely non-Christian person who lacks the values of Christianity.
Salam’s personality reflected a completely unethical person who is selfish, jealous and hates everyone around him even though he pretends with the complete opposite. His outward appearance and hypocritical demeanor might give the impression that he is a genuinely honest person, but the reality is quite the opposite; and often appearances can be deceiving.
Findings
Before you read the below, I urge you to consider all information shared herein as well as the previously published articles and the supplementing material, in addition to the totality of the circumstances prior making a judgement such as rumors or thinking of it as a mental crisis.
Salam appears to be a terrorist and linked to extremist groups such as “ISIS” for example, more of a Jihadist in a modern undercover form; possesses expert psychology knowledge and employs it in conducting clandestine abusive experiments or clinical trials using advanced classified technologies on human subjects, leading to terrorizing them, suffering and eventual death. His actions seem to be motivated by a desire for revenge, hatred and/or financial gain. I am one of the victims subjected to similar treatment, yet my suffering is dismissed as a mental illness or crisis.
In a relatable context, I received a threatening image through Instagram for a targeted photo of a man with a long beard who appeared to be from the Middle East, portrayed in an upside-down position that gave the impression of decapitation. The image was a result of manipulation of my Instagram feed.
Not only, I started to receive targeted threats based on Extreme Islamic content on my YouTube feed on my cellphone and even my TV - regardless of my interests that doesn’t reflect such content. Why would YouTube feauture Islamic Content on top of my feed and not Christian Content when I primarily search for Christian videos or hymns when I’m utilizing the application. Some of such targeted content are below.
Is that not terrorism? Factoring the disparities and the totality of the circumstances explained herein.
And why is the FBI not acting upon these for three years? Because they and jointly with the maliciously affiliated individuals such as Salam Morcos are the ones who conduct it.
My recognition of Salam's involvement in the organized crimes emerged from a series of events and accumulated offenses. Additionally, my work-related interactions with him and subsequent discoveries after my termination from Builders Capital in connection to the organized crime contributed to such recognition. By connecting all these data points, I was able to create a clear picture of Salam's malicious involvement in the crimes.
Salam was simply hired to better understand my personality and character while being my manager under the cover of developing and maintaining the Loan Management System of the company. In fact, the system was developed and being maintained by an outsourced company called LightSpeed Solutions and the company never ended their contract with them after Salam’s hire.
School Shooting Threat
Before LightSpeed Solutions, the company outsourced development work to a Vietnamese team for a system it operated under the name "EZ Builders Capital," which is now outdated. Later, this name was linked to a targeted YouTube video that implied threats to school shootings and was subsequently reported to the CIA. See the screenshot below. This incident was part of a broader series of targeted activities, as highlighted in this article.
Casually and from their perspective: “We plan to send him a video featuring the EZ school bus as part of a sarcastic clip that carries a dual meaning. You can’t blame YouTube for featuring a comedic school bus video that might be seen as innocuous; however, the underlying message, given the context of the situation serves as a direct threat to school shootings with the term "EZ" being the key element.”
The FBI cites 'complex' communication methods on their website in relation to criminal syndicates. However, in this case, the Bureau seems not knowing what ‘complex’ is. Question: Is the threat landscape beyond their control? Perhaps a more authoritative DDepartment needs to step in, or are they under some form of bribery?
Another School Shooting Threat
The below video represents another threat to school shootings by the reported entities through cybercrime while I was drafting a text to share with church members for their statements in the case.
The swipe keyboard is smart enough to generate the most predictable word based on the user's typing history and the suitability of the word in a sentence. However, in this case it chooses and insists to generate "child" instead of "cold" several times although I discarded it the first, second and third time that it should have already been replaced with the next close keyword from the first time I deleted it. As a result, the threat is relayed to CIA that is surveilling communications in realtime.
Video preview failed to load? Click Here
Questions:
Can someone justify the above behavior?
Does the FBI really not see a clear threat implication in that in addition to the cybercrime?
Continuing Regarding Salam Morcos
Keywording or Vocabularing
As part of the Nazi agenda and the joint organized crime driven by hatred and financial profit, one of the key methods for establishing a foundation for relaying implications is "keywording" or "vocabularing" that involves crafting or utilizing specific leading keywords and subtly introducing them to the victim through frequent mentions in casual conversations or contexts, typically occurring before the crimes begin.
The consistent use of these distinguished keywords creates a kind of an "imprint" on the victim's mind. Later on, such imprint is used as a "trigger" for targeted harassment or threats, alongside other tactics. The influence of such tactic may resemble a symptom of PTSD, but in reality it is precisely engineered. Such crimes are designed to appear as mental illness to the general public, which is why they are referred to as “psychological manipulations and exploitations.” after-all.
During my interactions with Salam at Builders Capital, he employed the same tactic, using the approach of scattering or throwing out puzzle pieces to form a kind of "road map." This strategy was later utilized in systematic patterns against me. Such tactic was a significant indication that helped identify him as one of the key individuals involved in orchestrating the organized crime.
Examples
He would randomly throw questions such as “why do you think I have hidden agendas?” He also introduced some terms that could be considered slang and don’t always reflect their literal meanings. For instance, expressions like “overkill” and “I will go in a cave”.
“The IT Department Had no Identity Until Salam Came”
In many of our meetings, Salam consistently stated, “The IT department had no identity until I came” referring to himself, as if he is the long-waited prophet - and with each time he made this claim, it felt as if all my contributions to the company were diminished in an instant. Help me understand why I was required to conduct a four-hour training session after my termination that included him as a trainee, followed by a one-month transition period to answer inquiries about the company’s IT systems.
Also, such statement reflects his extremism ideologies he is influenced by, especially when saying “until I came” vs “until I was hired” - aside from the whole statement that resembles ego.
He furthermore frequently messaged me on Microsoft Teams at around 1 or 2 AM, which felt intentional. I later realized that it was a way to test my psychological response and reaction to annoyance - a part of the psychological manipulation aspect within the organized crime.
At the beginning of the crimes around March 2022, Salam’s sister-in-law, Marie Henry, who previously worked at Builders Capital, posted a Instagram story that at the time seemed vague. Marie’s post came just right before I began to notice the crimes. See below screenshot.
Marie's caption serves as a subtle hint that reinforces my perspective on Salam, especially considering a significant portion of the criminal activities appears to center around him. I don't accuse Marie of being maliciously involved.
Notably, several employees on his team, who were previously reporting to other managers have transitioned to report to him including myself, as my reporting shifted from Robert Trent to Salam. Shortly thereafter, two key contributors to the company under his team, Catherine Quinn and Brooke Abney (pictured below respectively) who have shown integrity and loyalty to the company over several years have resigned one after the other soon after the reporting changed to Salam Morcos. Their resignations appeared to be coerced, resulting from mistreatment and an intentional hostility.
On my final day in the office, October 7th, while I was in the process of transferring data to Robert Trent and still had access to my work email, as well as being enrolled in distribution groups, I received an email from “Jeff Jou” (software engineer, pictured below) via the information technology group I was part of. It is important to highlight that I have no accusations against Jeff apart from him being a good co-worker.
The email stated that "Verena Girgis" (see image below) is resigning from the company. Verena is also part of the Coptic Orthodox Church community that I belong to, and which Salam joined after relocating to the U.S. - She worked as a software engineer, was a colleague of Jeff’s, and was also supervised by Salam Morcos.
Verena's resignation also appears to have been coerced where the employee forfeits their severance, if not termination. Surprisingly, it was announced just one day after I was scheduled to be terminated on October 6, 2021. Robert allowed an extra day per my request to transfer access and data to him due to the extensive nature of the systems and data I managed, in addition to the mental shock I experienced on Oct 6th that I did not disclose at that time. Hence, my final day in the office was October 7th.
It appears that the C-level executives planned to terminate Verena on October 7th, intently creating a one-day gap from my termination, knowing that we share the same church community. Because what is the likelihood of her resigning voluntarily one day after my termination, unless it was coercion or termination?. I found out about her resignation because her colleague Jeff sent the announcement to the IT group, which I was still enrolled in. It appears they failed to synchronize the timing in relation to the day after my termination as previously discussed.
During a personal gathering in a later date with church members at a restaurant near my previous residence in Lynnwood, WA, I encountered Verena. I tried to greet her and asked her why she had left the company. At that moment, I was unaware of the ongoing organized crime. I immediately noticed a look of fear on her face, as well as evident signs of discomfort in her body language. I remember that she hasn't responded at all this time, unlike before, and her sudden silence implicated that she might have been threatened; that’s the conclusion I came to based on her reaction.
Extortion Through Cybercrime
In around Jan 2022, three months after my termination from Builders Capital, I noticed that the people in my Church started looking at me in a different way than what I used to that seemed concerning but I couldn't understand at that time why all these people looking at me in that manner since nothing about my behavior has changed.
In Feb 2022, when my employment started at Ford Motor Company that was recently revealed as a covert CIA involvement in the case, I realized a back-dated cyber breach on my personal data and devices that justified why these people were looking at me in that manner. I realized that I have been extorted with my sensitive pictures and videos shared with all my contacts - and all the data points and indications of cybercrime were pointing towards Builders Capital, Robert Trent, Ken Trent, Beth Glein and Salam Morcos being the individuals behind such extortion and breach.
Upon recognizing the cybercrime and extortion, I recalled subtle implications made by Salam Morcos during our meetings. His implications reminded me of past work I had done for my previously owned business, which involved web development, though I had never shared the source code with anyone. At that time, I put away the possibility of being breached and assumed a coincidence. By connecting this data point with my recognition of extortion, threat implications and others have affirmed on those concerns of breach.
A Cybercrime Email Interception - Middle in The Man
The following aligns with the current experienced cybercrimes on a higher level. In one of my replies to Curt Altig (owner of Builders Capital, pictured below) over emails responding to an inquiry by him regarding email deliverability and security, I indicated that I implemented a security measure that prevents against “Man in The Middle Attacks”; and while I’m certain that I sent the text as the aforementioned, I found that it was inadvertently sent as “Middle in the Man” instead upon checking the message I sent.
I promptly corrected it, and while I'm not necessarily accusing Curt herein; however, such alteration of keywords intended to hint the criminal retaliation that took place later - performed through cybercrime by implying for a profanity gesture, “Middle in The Man,” where the term "man" refers to me.
Cybercrime on my Personal Microsoft Account
Similar to the previously explained cybercrime on my Dropbox account. Upon obtaining the logs of my personal Microsoft Account, I noticed unrecognized login attempts to my account. Also, during one of my calls with Microsoft regarding the export of my logs, the representative I spoke with said “they also have another request here” which hinted that another authority may have submitted a request for an export of those logs - that was during my employment with Ford.
Trafficking Implications
Before threading the relevant context about Salam, here's a notable instance where during a Microsoft Teams call with Bryan Trent, Robert Trent’s brother, I was helping him with a technical request. During our conversation, Bryan mentioned a discussion he had with Robert about me, saying he had told Robert to "send him to Mexico." At the time, I didn't think much of it and assumed it was meant as a joke; however, I've since come to understand that it implied something more concerning related to trafficking.
While reviewing a small fee from Zendesk, the ticketing system I implemented for the company in an Excel file received from accounting. As the person responsible for managing the system and its licenses, I couldn’t connect this fee to any license or bundle we had signed up for. Salam was CC’d on the email, and he swiftly responded, stating it was a “foreign transaction fee.” Interestingly, Salam was not involved in the licensing process or in setting up and maintaining the system, yet he had an immediate explanation. It's worth noting that Zendesk is an American company based in San Francisco, and the credit card we used for our subscription payments was also from the U.S. - So, the question is: why was a foreign transaction fee charged or included in the Excel file? It was simply a futuristic act to implicate trafficking in a later date based on the consequences of their crimes.
In other words, what happens when they conduct their full scale crimes meanwhile, the authorities are incapable of combating the threats? or some of them are affiliated? The victim who is myself will eventually seek somewhere else. Right? But my bank accounts and credit cards are established in the U.S. which means wherever I go in hope to flee from their crimes that there is a chance of using those credit cards overseas; and if so, I will be charged a “foreign transaction fee”, right? Now, I will remember the illogical “foreign transaction fee” occurred on Zendesk and that Salam has quickly indicated in his email and correlate it with the “foreign transaction fee” I incurred as a result of their crimes. Did you get it?
Similar to Girgis’s (from the FBI) implication for sending me to Dubai in another trafficking attempt connected to the case as explained in the below video which was followed with an unrecognized login to my Instagram account from Dubai through cybercrime but I wasn’t there and/or have been using a VPN connected to a server in Dubai whatsoever. Meanwhile, the FBI does not see this as a cybercrime or a trafficking implication.
The above-referenced unrecognized Dubai login.
If you’re questioning the validity of the case, can you justify the above?
Can the cyber experts at the FBI in cohesion with their intelligence analysts provide a logical explanation on this please?
On the same note as the above, the below implications were founded in the same way, citing notable keywords and vocabulary that Salam intended to repeatedly say as previously mentioned.
“I overlooked it”
During the meetings with Salam, he would frequently use the phrase “I overlooked it” within the context of the conversation. And while this can sound normal to anyone which sounded normal to me back then; however, later, the result of the crimes I’m being subjected to have severely affected my financials which led that I incurred an over draft fee on my Bank of America account. Upon logging into my account on the app, the first headline I noticed on the app which was in regards to that overdraft fee was “Did you overlook something?”; hence, instantly reminding me of the frequently said phrase by Salam, subsequently realizing why he used to feed me such phrase with “overlooked” being the lead keyword.
In other words, picture yourself being a bad person. You are part of a plan for an organized crime against someone, you then decide to feed them specific keywords and repeat it often that becomes resonating on their brain that when they see or hear that keyword in a later date, it reminds them of you. Surround that keyword in a criminal context where the victim has acknowledged the crimes being practiced against them and their actors. Now, picture yourself being the victim; what would you feel upon seeing such unique keyword popping-up as a consequence result from the crimes you’re facing which is the financial sabotage?
“I’ll go in a cave”
Frequently that Salam sent me “I’ll go in a cave” in a way of describing that he will be focusing on a task or being on a non-disturb mode. Later in the date when I started being abused neurally and realized that I had been implanted with a microchip during a previous procedure I underwent in the past (view CT scans here), I decided to use a “Faraday Cave”, apologies for the intended typo, Faraday Cage* in order to mitigate the neural torture by isolating or lessening the signals. A sample picture below.
At that point, I was able to correlate why Salam intended to use such phrase of him going inside a Cave with myself going inside a Faraday Cage - which came along with his other vocabulary.
Here is how they think: they plan according to the conclusions that their victims may form and the dependable actions their victims may take as a result of their crimes which could be precautionary measures as an example, and plan in advance based on these. Being a psychological manipulation expert such as Salam, he understands well the response of a victim and have probably seen many of these in the past when a victim is subjected to neural torture. One of these could be that the victim try to isolate themselves in a Faraday Cage - correct? Hence, the in-advance futuristic implication. Brutal, right?
Un-consented Call Recordings
The company asked me to activate the interception and recording of work phone calls on Zoom, which was the phone system in use at that time.
I implemented these features, including audible disclaimers to inform participants of the monitoring and recording, in compliance with state laws. Later, upper management, specifically Robert Trent and Beth Glein, requested that I disable the audible disclaimer. I refused, explaining that it would violate legal requirements.
Interestingly, Beth Glein replied in the email thread in a confusing way that indirectly implied disabling the audible disclaimer regardless whether it is viable to turn off the recording feature or not that did not make sense provided that we had already discussed it verbally previously and her awareness that it can be disabled. There were further verbal attempts from Beth, Salam, and Sean Bobadilla to disable the audible disclaimer while leaving the recording feature, further detailed below. Screenshot below of the referenced email.
I then responded by citing legal resources from the Washington state government website that highlight the necessity of an audible disclaimer for audio monitoring, interception, and recording. Below is the rest of the email thread.
Subsequently, Salam Morcos sent me a message through Teams asking me to enable audio recording without the disclaimer, and I once again refused. He then called me on Teams and pressured me to grant Curt Altig administrative permissions on the corporate Zoom account. I did assign those permissions to Curt Altig, as he is the owner and one of the principals of the company. Following that, Salam enabled the recording and monitoring of calls through Curt’s account while turning off the audible disclaimer.
And before that, Sean Bobadilla, the Director of Recruiting/HR (pictured below) approached me once and asked if I can setup the Inside Sales team to listen and intercept others calls through the headsets I used to purchase for the loan officers under the claim of training.
I denied Sean’s request, relying on Katherine’s email (attorney) to not enable recording without an audible disclaimer. Sean further added verbally that they (where he used to work at before) at Robert Half used to enable it without an audible disclaimer.
Intent of Forge and Fraud
After the closed-door meeting with Robert Trent, Katherine Christofilis, and Sean Bobadilla (HR Director), during which I was terminated under duress, Chalo Quinn (a pushed employee) approached me and asked me to sign a piece of paper that seemed to have a list of other names on it.
Chalo claimed it was a friendly gesture towards a company (Fidelity) they had met with earlier on that day. However, the true intention behind this request appeared to be to gather my signature and maliciously include it in the separation agreement (Forgery) if I refused to sign, along with other agreements of which I was unaware. I'm not quite sure what kind of a guest/visitor company asks all employees in the office to sign a piece of paper after a visit, as if we were celebrities being asked for an autograph. Seems like a scam, right?
Additional Acts of Hostility and Relatables
While the below does not represent a full comprehensive list of hostility but it gives a great idea on the intentional hostility and forced labor I experienced at the company that was resulting from a joint cooperation between individuals from my personal level as well as Builders Capital based on the mutual interest and the grounds added in previously shared articles.
A Sudden Forced Office Relocation
In September 2021, Beth Glein (COO) had suddenly mass-communicated (email below) and directed all on-site employees to start working from the new office location (Puyallup, WA) the next day without proper coordination with me provided that I was handling the integration of the Internet service with the service provider from my end. That is despite informing Beth and Jessica Corbett (Beth Glein’s assistant) that I cannot provide an exact date until I get a response from Comcast and see the Internet working there, then the company can announce the move date; in addition to other arrangements besides the Internet integration to the suite. Below is the email conversation.
The below were my responses.
Such act left me and Ruslan, another IT person who was newly hired at that time and haven’t digested the systems well and how they work yet. Leaving us unable to coordinate and prepare for tasks on our end in order to support a seamless migration and relocation from a technical perspective. We had to be on site over the weekend but that was not even enough.
As a result, the workload became too much to keep up with given such sudden office move that required undertaking completely new configurations of the network on site as well as responding to tickets from remote employees, requests from on site employees, provisioning new hires and dispatching them new devices and equipment, in addition to training Ruslan on the systems, and much more.
On the first day the fiber was installed in the suite, we ended up leaving the site later at night on that day because we were exhausted. After I arrived home, I sent an email to Robert Trent at around 10 PM informed him that the office is not ready for the people to relocate on the next day due to the network configuration being incomplete yet. Robert did not respond to my message on that day. Below is the screenshot of the email.
When I went on the next day, I realized that Robert and Salam had gone there at 3 AM in the morning from Beth’s email. See below.
As you can see from Beth’s email, she simply attributed all credit to Robert and Salam without a single reference to either Ruslan or myself for the work we did. Did she really not see the hard work we were performing or she intended to drop us from the picture in front of all employees?
Not only, I also learnt that Ruslan Howell had resignated without prior notice - only after around 3 weeks from starting with the company. He did not come to site and was not responding to any phone calls from Sean, Salam and/or Robert.
The office move was another intentional hostile act that intended to put an unreasonable overwhelming workload; and so, the question is:
If Salam is doing everything and he is the go to person for such and such, remind me why was I required to attend a virtual 4 hour meeting to train your Salam on the systems that I built for the company after wrongful termination?
Why was I required to stay on stand-by for 1 month getting paid base salary while your Salam getting paid over $400K to $500K a year?
Why did you have to fill my position with 5 more positions, one of which was providing the salary of $100K that I was asking for initially?
Background Record Harm Threat Implication
On September 17, 2021, as tensions escalated between Salam Morcos and me, Katherine Christofilis forwarded an email from Checkr, the background check company, for the first time to verify its legitimacy whether it is phishing or not.
That specific email from the background check company indicated “CONSIDER” as the recommended action which means that the report she ran on a prospective employee has at least one record that the company may want to review.
And despite that Katherine had received numerous similar emails previously from the same vendor in the same exact format - but she decided to send me this specific email that came during the peak of the hostility and only a few days prior my termination where legal ramifications were expected to represent a threat implication to harm my background record. Below is Katherine’s email.
And the below is the original email she received from Checkr.
“Wind it Down”
The below is an example of incorporating sophisticatedly crafted hints through intentional typos. At the peak of the intentional hostility, Beth Glein has furnished an email while including the keyword “winddown” as if it was a typo instead of “window”. Could it not be interpreted as “Wind it Down”? i.e. Lower the hostility down - addressed to Salam.
Are you going to blame someone for a typo? of course not. However, within the case framework or scheme, it represented a clear implication. Screenshot of the email below.
That is in addition from the email itself being an overly instructory. You know when you have been doing your job for long enough that you know its ins and outs better than many others, and yet someone from a different department comes in and imposes instructory directions upon you on every matter; that was Beth Glein (COO), not only with this email but with many others.
Intentional Misleading Spelling Mistakes for New Hires
It appeared that Sean Bobadilla, the head of recruiting/HR, intended to send me several names of new hires with intentional spelling errors. This was so that when I entered their names into the system, generating usernames based on the given spellings, the employees would subsequently request corrections to their names. This would effectively result in double work for me, as it would feel like I was provisioning devices and accounts for two hires for each individual with a spelling mistake. For example, a user account and username created on platforms like Microsoft Office 365 is linked to various other accounts and also affects their provisioned devices. Consequently, I would need to make changes and work with each employee to have them re-authenticated to their accounts.
Some of the notable names that I received misspelled names from them were:
Jason Trumer instead of Jason Treumer
Sarah Litt instead of Sarah Litts
Sabrina Daniels instead of Sabrina Daniel
Stephanie Halverson instead of Stephanie Halvorson
It is understandable that people do mistakes sometimes and write typos but when the phenomenon is repeated frequently despite verbal remarks provided before, and that it becomes often in addition to the surrounding acts of hostility, it becomes clear this was another intentional act of hostility. Below are the emails I received indicating the above.
On one occasion, Sean provided me with the name of a new hire, “Sabrina Daniel,” which was the correct spelling. He then followed up claiming a correction was needed, stating the name should be “Sabrina Daniels” with an added “s.”.
Since Sean had given me this supposed correction before I created her accounts and provisioned her work device, I assumed he was right which as a result I skipped on sending her an email over her personal email confirming the spelling of her name which was a task I started to follow after receiving a number of misspelled names from Sean.
On the next day and after I provisioned her device on the company’s cloud infrastructure as well as her accounts login IDs tied to the main cloud instance, Jessica (Beth’s assistant at that time) informed me about the name correction being “Sabrina Daniel” not “Daniels” which came in a time that I was preparing for an upcoming trip to California for a friends wedding. I called Sean on his phone and/or via Microsoft Teams to clarify the spelling, but he answered the call while appearing busy, quickly hung up after I mentioned the discrepancy, and said, “whatever spelling is on her ID.”
It seemed that the correction sent by Sean to me was intentionally misleading at a time that I busy the most that I had to drive to the office after hours around 11 PM to update her account details, re-provision her work device, and ensure she was re-authenticated in the system, so she wouldn't need much assistance when she started the next day, especially since I would be out of state. After completing all the necessary setups, I responded to Jessica Corbett, including Beth Glein and Sean Bobadilla in the email chain, which was submitted as a support ticket through Zendesk. See below.
Workstations Setup Hostility
Salam requested that I set up several workstations in the Seattle office, even though he was already aware of the upcoming relocation to Puyallup and the closure of the Seattle office. I discovered this information one or two days later from Jessica Corbett. In response, Salam promptly sent me a Teams chat message in an effort to to not expose the intentional hostility, asking "Did I tell you that we're moving to a Puyallup?" or similar. I had no idea about the relocation until the time Jessica told me which was after setting up those workstations as per Salam’s request that simply wasted valuable time that I could work on something else more beneficial.
A Notable IT Hire Instance
As I held seniority over Salam in the company, and given that the workload had become overwhelmingly challenging, particularly with straightforward issues like malfunctioning printers, I felt it necessary to bring in an entry-level IT staff member whom I described with “an entry-level employee who’s eager to learn and grow within the company”. This hire would be designated to focus on tier 1 support tickets, thereby freeing up my time to address more complex tasks that affect system uptime and productivity, as well as ensuring the integrity and security of our environments.
After Salam became my manager, I discussed this need with him, and we reached a consensus on hiring an entry-level IT employee. The request was submitted to Sean Bobadilla, the Recruiting Director, who then crafted a job advertisement that outlined the responsibilities I had defined previously for the role. A few days later, Sean invited me to interview a potential candidate, Ruslan Howell (pictured below), and included his resume in the email. Upon reviewing Ruslan's resume, I realized he was not an entry-level candidate and would actually be suited for a more advanced position that the company wasn't currently hiring for, which contradicted our earlier agreement. I had anticipated being the manager for that new hire, as I am more familiar with the environments, which I believed would align better with my responsibilities. However, I learned that the new IT hire will report to Salam instead of me. This situation reflected a further lack of transparency, hostility, and a troubling implication of layoff that was disconcerting.
In other words, you know when you hold a highly privileged position within a system, you handle all deployments, integrations, and implementations, and all your colleagues know you personally, it effectively places you at a director-level role, even if that isn't formalized on paper? Then someone new comes in, sees this, and feels envious. Since they have authority granted by the CEO, they can easily override your position and bring in someone with similar seniority, leaving you with no prospects for promotion and at risk of being laid off. That's exactly what Salam was doing, engaging in intentional acts of hostility driven by jealousy and resentment.
At one point while Salam was in one of the offices at the old Puyallup location (Rush Building), he told me, “I want you to train him, so I can fire you if I want to,” referring to Ruslan. This made me increasingly anxious that I could lose my job at any moment. It's important to mention that a former employee named Lorin Elliot may serve as a potential witness to this conversation, as she was sitting in a cubicle across from Salam's office.
What kind of manager threatens and tells one of their employees “I want you to train him so if I want to fire you, I can”?
Unexpected IT Hire
I indicated to Robert Trent that I’m comfortable with Austin Hughes (pictured below) and would like to bring him on as a full-time employee in which Austin welcomed initially during my conversation with him and Robert verbally agreed on.
To find that Sean Bobadilla had hired a totally different person almost the next day who had not been interviewed from my end, namely, David Pollack, in which opposed the outcome from the conversation with Robert.
Sean had even sent the standard new hire email after David had started as opposed to a few days prior notice from the start date of new employees. See below screenshot of the email including the sent date and time on the top-right compared to the start date of David in the body of the email.
How come David is listed reports to me, as you can see in the email, when I didn’t conduct an interview in the first place? And with respect to David, I was unable to get aligned with him. I simply saw David an advanced hire who is not suitable for the position he was hired for and the entitled responsibilities as per the job description.
Hostility Through Accounting
I felt as though I was taking on an additional accounting role on top of my IT responsibilities. I understand the following was a result of directions from Michele Fualii who is not even an employee with the company to the accounting staff.
The accounting department frequently pressured me to provide detailed descriptions and justification for each transaction related to the IT department and despite my explanations that these transactions were standard and necessary for the company's operations given that many of them were recurring, in addition to providing the accounting staff with the necessary access to the billing of each corporate account where they could review all transactions with justifications already provided and verify them against the credit card and bank records to confirm that no fraudulent activity was taking place that they continued to ask for detailed justifications for every charge, which felt hostile and harassing, almost implying false accusations of theft or misuse of the card which is incorrect.
At one point, I mentioned to Michele Fualii that, “I’m happy to provide details for transactions related to laptops and other equipment if you'd like to conduct a through audit.” I hoped this would result in a one-time review so we could move on, but it got to the point where I felt I was performing extra work as an accounting auditor for their team that was resulting from an intentional hostility.
Cont’d - A Sudden Forced Office Relocation
Another perspective on the hostility in regards to relocating to the new Puyallup office location (see below picture) and pulling the fiber to the suite. There was a lot of confusion on the office suite number for some reason that was communicated. Initally, it was communicated as 210 then they corrected it to be 220 instead; however, on site, the actual suite number that the company was supposed to occupy was 200 which is different from both of the aforementioned despite the sign on the suite being 220. In other words, the numbering on the floor plan of the building is 200 but the hanged sign is incorrect. Vendors such as Comcast go by the floor plans for service installations and the wrong information caused a great confusion and further delay.
I also received the information of the suite prior to the move date they aimed for by only one month if not less. Despite attempts to expedite the process with Comcast but I was being intensly pressured, asked every day and many times about when the Internet installation status as if I was the person who is going to pull the the fiber from ground up to the suite.
Aside from changing the vendor; however, the setup from such vendor whom Salam and Beth forced their service instead of Comcast had lacked a fiber converter as opposed to Comcast standard installations which wasn’t expected and represented another obstacle. Regardless from all that as explained earlier in this article, Beth Glein has communicated the sudden move date to the new office but they needed Internet working somehow and regardless. Isn’t that hostility?
So, they provided me with wrong suite number, then they come back force an office move out of a sudden while attempting to blame the fault on myself and I had provided them prior notice that the process takes time. We had already enough space at the old office to onboard more on-site employees as well as the office lease was ending by the end of the year and they were already paying for it. Why did you not provide the correct suite number in the first place? Why did you force the sudden office move? A pure evil act of hostility.
H1B Visa Fraud
The company also engages in H1B Visas fraud. Below is a screenshot indicating the issuance of an H1B Visa for an Information Technology Manager with a salary of $120,000 on July 29th, 2019.
I’m legally authorized to work in the United States and did not require any type of Visa sponsorship to start employment with Builders Capital. I started the position at the company as an IT Administrator (on documents) on August 21st, 2019 which was around one month after the above-referenced H1B Visa issuance, being informed that the previous IT Administrator who spent around a year and half with the company had left with no IT personnel for around three weeks.
The company had a Power BI Developer, Kranthi Sukka (pictured below) who was laid off during COVID’s mass terminations and was not performing any type of IT work.
Builders Capital did not provide an individual holding the title of Information Technology Manager or a comparable role with the salary specified in the H-1B Visa application. As mentioned earlier, I was the sole IT employee performing the responsibilities of an IT Director, but my title was listed as IT Administrator, which places me in a completely different salary category.
They effectively brought me on as an Information Technology Manager, officially designating me as an IT Administrator. At the same time, they hired another individual (Kranthi) to carry out specific Power BI tasks and sponsored him for an H1B visa, falsely claiming that he was being hired as an Information Technology Manager, which is entirely misleading and fraudulent.
Pay Discrimination
Builders Capital leadership is successful in depleting people’s energy while paying the lowest salaries to some of their top performing employees whereas paying extremely high salaries for others who may have an equivalent experience or less and not performing the same amount of work. The company knows how to incorporate favoritism and discrimination very well.
I’m not against hard work but when the workload becomes overwhelming and unbearable combined with intentional hostility and the assignment of tasks out of the scope that was initially agreed upon in the job description, it creates an issue.
The last days of my employment at Builders Capital were extremely distressing that I felt as if I was a fish pulled from the water, gasping for air in an environment that became hostile. The combination of being under-appreciated, overworked, and facing systemic hostility created a situation that was not only mentally devastating but also significantly demoralizing.
Below was the conversation around my salary a day prior my termination.
Forced Labor, Bait and Switch Hirings
During my time with the company, I have observed numerous individuals being hired for positions and responsibilities that do not align with what they were expected to deliver. This also applies to my role as an IT employee.
Builders Capital made the decision to close its Oregon office and terminated Wade Stewart (pictured below), the loan officer responsible for overseeing that location.
As the only employee responsible for managing the return of the company's IT equipment after terminations, office closures, or relocations, Katherine Christofilis sent me a message through Microsoft Teams asking me to handle this myself, stating that "I have to drive there" where instead, we could pay someone more suitable to take on the task. While I don’t mind occasionally taking on responsibilities outside my designated duties, it becomes an issue when this becomes a routine. Nevertheless, I drove to Oregon over the weekend, a three-hour journey from my residence in Lynnwood, Washington, to Oregon back to Puyallup to drop of the equipment then back to my residence.
What kind of company requires an IT employee to undertake a three-hour drive each way to retrieve equipment and fails to designate an appropriate person for such tasks?
Similarly, I also witnessed that Jessica Corbett (Beth’s assistant) was being instructed to handle some of the hard labor such as heavy lifting of items, a task that required a person with a strong build such as a handy man. Obviously that wasn’t the role she was hired for.
Hinted Harassments
Before getting into the details of this event, here is a brief on my personal background that is important to highlight for the understanding of this event. I’m an immigrant, moved to the U.S. in 2016. I’m originally from Egypt and studied Computer Sciences in the British University.
After relocating to the U.S. in 2016 and obtaining the necessary paperwork, I initially worked as a retail employee at a gas station and then took on a ridesharing job, a three years of self-study and hard work until I was hired at Builders Capital in 2019 and resuming my career path in the tech industry that I carried over. I also used to operate a small tech firm that I dissolved after starting with Builders Capital. The combination of my studies as well as my company provided me with a decent versatile experience in the tech field.
Upon joining Builders Capital, I encountered harassment related to my previous experience as a retail worker. This information was not included in my resume, yet the company appeared to have prior knowledge of my background.
The harassment came from Robert Hadley (pictured below), a principal partner in the company and owner of an affiliated company, Hadley Properties, when he implicated to me in the first few days after starting with the company by saying “We’re not going to care about the company’s janitorial and leave the security” or similar phrase in a conversation surrounding IT security and priotrization.
Clearly, if I were not meeting expectations, it wouldn't make sense for the company to require me to conduct a four-hour training virtual meeting for a principal engineer (Salam Morcos) and two additional IT personnel, along with the CEO, Robert Trent after my termination, while also advertising for four to five more IT job openings. Correct?
In a similar instance, on a Wednesday in 2020 as I recall, I had an elevated argument with Robert Hadley, the next day in the morning while driving on highway I-5 N to work, someone hit my car from the back. While exchanging the insurance information, I noticed identical facial and speaking traits as Maurice Hafzalla (pictured below), brother to Girgis Hafzalla, corrupt FBI but also a painter, just like Maurice. The incident was a clear retaliation act but also an indication to the connection between the parties from the professional level as well as the personal level given the referenced facial/speaking traits which reinforces the genome editing on humans, another part of the case.
Similarly, they sent a targeted person on a recent flight in November 2023 who looked just like Curt Altig, sitting right next to me that I mistaken him for Curt at the first glance. His appearance was exactly similar to Curt's, from his facial expressions to his manner of speaking, and even his voice and phonetics, which led me to mistake him for Curt at the first glance. He started a brief conversation with me and somehow appeared to recognize me.
The practice of aligning people who looks like twins to others within the case is not new, it has been ongoing throughout the case with other people, and I do not know how they are able to find people and have them be targeted like that. Is it genome editing or other, I’m not sure, but I shared other instances like that previously in my documentations. If the Government and the facilities equipped with security cameras brought those footages up, they will validate my claims.
Indications of Connection Between Parties
As mentioned above, the two main parties are Builders Capital and individuals from the Coptic Orthodox Church Community that I’m part of while the third party, the FBI acting as a liaison between the two. The below events and data points are key indications to the connections between those parties. Some of the below are also dependent on previously shared articles.
The below are indications of the mutual interest of an organized crime between the company and individuals on my personal level whom some of them are unfortunatley family members whereas the FBI acting as a liaison between the two.
Data Points
The alternation of implications and patterns from each side evidenced in this article.
Date of Girgis’s resignation from the FBI that was exactly aligned with my termination from Builders Capital, but also his return back to the bureau as he alleged over a phone call in June 2022 was also aligned with the start of my employment at Ford Motor Company that as mentioned previously and recently revealed was as a CIA covert involvement in the case.
Marie Henry being the sister-in-law to Salam Morcos who referred him to the job at Builders Capital, same as referred myself to the position where Marie is a member of the Coptic Orthodox Church Community that I'm part of and joined in 2016 and that Salam joined after moving over to the U.S. in 2021. Hence, acting as a liaison between both, Builders Capital and the corrupt from the church side.
Stealing of My Work Permit
Since my employment was based on a work permit (EAD, not a Work Visa) that I renew every two years directly through the USCIS until a green card is issued, my employment at Builders Capital was based on it. If for some reason I’m unable to renew my work permit prior to its expiration, then the employment may be voided. My category of EAD provide an automatic extension of validity post their expiry date by 6 months in the event of delay on the USCIS end. The permit does not require any involvement or sponsorship from a company to be issued or renewed.
Since my address was initially set to one of my uncle’s who I did not foresee him to be involved in the organized crime, namely Wagdi Hafzalla (pictured below) who is also a brother to Girgis, the corrupt FBI agent. The renewal application of my work permit had his address instead of mine. Therefore, the card was mailed to his address.
I realized why my new work permit was intently hidden by Wagdi when it arrived at his address and the intent behind it was to forfeit my employment at Builders Capital without the company having to lay me off and be subjected to potential legal ramifications. The below threads the event in detail.
While I eagerly awaited my EAD work permit to arrive so that I could finally forward it to HR (specifically, Sean Bobadilla) at Builders Capital, given that my previous EAD was nearing expiration, I informed Wagdi Hafzalla about the expected delivery date of the new card from USCIS, which was set for August 21, 2022.
I continually checked the delivery status on the USPS website and enabled delivery notifications. As soon as I received a notification that the card had arrived in Wagdi's mailbox, I quickly texted him at 4:27 PM PST to let him know and asked for permission to pick it up since my case address was registered at his residence. Wagdi replied that he would be home at 6 PM PST. I responded that I would come after that time, but he then told me I could pick it up anytime. Given that I had permission to do so, I decided not to wait until 6 PM and drove to Wagdi's house immediately.
Upon arriving, I noticed his Toyota Highlander parked outside, which indicated that he was home, even though he had mentioned he'd only be back at 6 PM. I didn’t knock on the door; I just wanted the card. I opened the mailbox and searched for the USCIS letter among other mail, but I couldn't find it. After double-checking, I still came up empty-handed. I looked up the tracking number on the USPS website, which indicated that it had been "delivered inside the mailbox." I texted Wagdi about it, but he didn’t reply. I then called him several times without getting an answer.
At this point, I panicked and started searching around his house. I drove to two nearby addresses with similar street names and numbers hoping that the USPS had mistakenly delivered it there. At the first address, the street didn’t match what I had in my navigation app, so I returned to Wagdi's house to check again, continuing to call him with no success. I then approached his neighbor across the street to see if they had noticed anything unusual. Driving a few streets further down, I luckily spotted a USPS truck coming toward me. I pulled over quickly and waved for the driver to stop so I could ask if he was the one who had delivered my letter. Upon showing him the tracking number, he confirmed that he had delivered it and said it was placed inside the mailbox. When I expressed my inability to find it, he suggested, "Someone must be stealing your mail."
Next, I drove to the second nearby address to investigate further. I attempted to ask the owner if they had seen anything, but they did not respond, and I had to leave feeling dejected. Shortly thereafter, Wagdi finally called me, stating that he had the letter and that I could meet him at St. Mary’s Church, as he said he was headed there. When I arrived and he handed me the letter, he mentioned, “They threw it on the doorstep,” which contradicted both what the USPS driver had said and the delivery confirmation indicating it was placed inside the mailbox. I became suspicious about the entire situation and questioned why Wagdi would handle it that way, especially knowing how urgently I needed my work permit. I decided to let it go for the moment since I had finally received the card. However, as I reflected on the event as well as the circumstances experienced as a result of the crimes that indicated a clear connection between the parties, I realized that it was a planned stealing attempt of my work permit planned in coordination with Builders Capital so I lose my job without the company being accountable for wrongful termination.
Vendor Work Email with Personal Connection
On a day, I received an email from a contracted vendor (ITN) where an employee from that vendor asked if I’m related to the “Hafzallas” as a family, and mentioned Girgis’s name (FBI) as well as his son and daughters.
While his inclusion to their names and reference to them came in a welcoming context but the intent could have been a hint to a connection between Girgis and the company that I was not aware of at that time. Connecting this to the date of Girgis’s alleging to leaving the FBI as well as the other events constitutes another strong data point towards such connection. Email thread screenshot below.
A Sudden Frequent use of “Salam” name
When the case has started, suddenly connected individuals such as Girgis Hafzalla, corrupt FBI Agent (pictured below) and my uncle who is part of the same church community would start his calls by saying “Salam”, not referring directly to Salam Morcos; however, the word in Arabic can deliver two meanings which are “Hello” or “Peace” but the phone greeting has always been “Hi Mina” or “Hello” and has never been “Salam” just until the start of the case where the circumstances point towards Salam Morcos representing a significant part in the case. Such word has also been presented in writing by Girgis Hafzalla on a card that he left on my apartment’s door that started with “Salam..Mina” and was written as “سلام يا مينا“ for whom can read the language.
The word that is delivered by Girgis intended to deliver two implications which are “we need peace” that is coming from one of the Mob Leaders in the Church whilst also attempting to free themselves from the responsibility in the crimes and attributing it all on Salam solely by saying “It’s Salam, Mina”.. in a sense. Below is one of the voicemails Girgis left me on August 24th, 2022 where he started it with “Salam.. Mina” (looped).
The voicemail came at the peak of the irritation by the lawful authority involved in the case, CIA in the light of the retaliatory violent action taken against them: Robb Elementary School Shooting - as well as in parallel with other continuous threats and harassments.
Not only, but also other people from the Church started repeating the word “Salam”, and I’m not accusing them of anything, but it’s an indication to a hinted reference to either Peace or “Salam Morcos”.
Another notable instance where one of my close friends in around July 2022 while I was at the Church with a group of friends told me “Do something..Mina!” in Arabic as “اعمل حاجه يا مينا” he then repeated it in English, he then said “Salam.. Salam”. The term can also be used to express wonder in the Arabic slang if preceded with the preposition “ya” (Arabic); but it was clearly referring to “Salam” as a person since he directed those phrases to me suddenly and out of the context but also his facial expressions and body language expressed the hinted implication to Salam as well as dropping the “ya” Arabic preposition that delivers the interpretation of wonder.
Recently in July 2024, I called a person from the church asking them to testify in the case, the first few seconds he answered my call, he pretended not hearing me and kept saying repeatedly “Salam.. Salam” several times.
These people from the church are the insiders whom are also my friends and have been in this community before I join it in 2016, they are aware of whom motivates the crimes when it comes to the church’s community side.
The Mental Illness Theme
After all that, I suddenly became mentally ill to everyone, Wagdi tells me I’m abnormal and harasses me and so as Renee, Wagdi’s niece and member of the criminal syndicate involved in the case (pictured below) falsely alleging that I’m experiencing a “mental health crisis”.
Interestingly, Renee’s protection order against me, the victim who is afraid from them was honored; meanwhile, when I filed protection orders against Wagdi and Renee in court they got denied even though I provided explanations to events and requested the court to issue orders to obtain footages as evidence on those events. Such judgements by court were made not out of fairness, but out of fear of violent crimes.
Renee intended to mention before the judge saying “I’m an elementary school teacher" in reference to herself to represent an indirect threat to school shootings (in a sense) provided the context of the case that involved motivating for school shootings in retaliation against the CIA based on the agency’s involvement. I’m not seeing a reason for her randomly incorporating such statement other than the intention of delivering a hinted implication of a threat.
Just like Simeon, a former company employee that held a position with access to some sensitive data who passed away on the same day of my termination from the company and was called “mentally ill” by Katherine Christofilis but Simeon’s death appears to be murder. Explained further below in this article.
Notable Series of Mental Illness
A separate mental illness implications is added in this article followed by another series of implications jointly made between the corrupt individuals at the church and Builders Capital.
Robert Trent Nearby My Apartment
Another reason that reinforces Robert Trent’s connection to the crimes even though this has already been addressed previously is that on a Monday night in around March 2022, I glanced Robert Trent’s Mercedes car driving behind me by several meters where I live at in Lynnwood which is 54 miles far away from Robert’s residence at that time that was in Graham, WA.
Robert owns a unique model of Mercedes which is uncommon on the streets but also he has a black badge covering the front Mercedes emblem that can be easily identifiable. Below is a figurative picture of the vehicle.
You know when you have a friend who owns a a specific car that is equipped with certain characteristics you’re familiar with and you see it from a distance then you realize that is them and be able to identify them from a distance? That was the case here.
It is very unlikely that someone who lives in the far south Seattle comes up north but also happens to be Robert Trent, not only, and during the start of the case and the peak of the implications. What are the odds?
Stay out of Trouble
In the last few months prior to my termination, Robert Trent often warned me saying “stay out of trouble.” At the time, I didn't understand the meaning behind his words and treated them as a joke. However, once the events of the case started and I became aware of the CIA's involvement, I understood why Robert repeatedly said that phrase. It revealed his prior knowledge and anticipation of the escalatory circumstances. Although such phrase may appear to be indicating care, but the underlying intention behind it was deceitful.
Robert aimed to impose an undue emotional influence over me in a way when I recall his words or encounter them again in some form, they cause me to mistakenly believe that he didn't wish to harm me, including the possibility of death. I never would have expected a mob leader, potentially facing a death sentence, to show mercy to someone who could be the reason for their conviction of such sentence.
You Got Robbed
On the same note of implications through keywording, the FBI has made a notable post in around July 2022 encouraging people for reporting cybercrimes while adding “we rob them from their tools” at the end of the brief post in reference to cyber criminals. That reminded me of Rob Trent instantly and was one of the reasons encouraged me to submit tips to the FBI that were faced with ignorement.
Also, “ugotrobbed” as in “You Got Robbed” was one of the notable usernames that Robert Trent had on his Instagram account. Both Robert’s username and the above post by the FBI do not exist anymore.
Reporting to the FBI was prior realizing their involvement in the crimes and also acknowledging the covert CIA lawful involvement in the case.
Call with Robert Trent on Dec 15th, 2023
The call I made to Robert was in an effort to reach a resolution through a settlement that unfortunately lead to no where.
On Dec 15th, 2023, I wrote a message on LinkedIn that was addressed to Robert Trent but did not send it, similar to a placeholder message - that is given my awareness of the 24/7 surveillance and my understanding that such writing is being seen by him and others involved that I don’t have to send them.
I wrote the following, "make me own a paradise" as an Implication of accepting a settlement in which I actually meant it back then, a few minutes after I called Robert over the phone and surprisingly, out of all other calls that I made previously that he picked up this particular call right after I drafted such message “make me own a paradise” - however, the conversation was as following:
Mina: I wanted to discuss a settlement.
Robert:
Are you trying to get money out of me?
Would you let me pay to see a doctor?
Mina.. Do you need help? He then paused and added Do you need help? while stressing on the word "help" intensely in the second time he repeated the question.
Phone call ended. This is also another demonstrated indication to the mentioned surveillance and cybercrime.
Call with Girgis Hafzalla on Dec 28th, 2023
In a similar instance as the above, which was also based on my awareness of the cybercrime and surveillance but also the sensitivity of the case. I drafted a piece of text on my cellphone and called it a "Peace Treaty".
Such text included some conditions I added. One of those conditions was a note to myself which was "vague" as a reminder to keep the pre-scheduled phone conversation with Girgis vague in respect to the confidentiality of the case. When I got connected with Girgis (former FBI as he alleges) later on that day, I started to discuss more details openly as a result of his replies that simply were pointing to no resolution from his end and subsequently the parties he is connected to.
After I started arguing with Girgis while entailing more direct details, he then cut me off and suddenly said in a louder voice "VAGUE!".. I said to him “what?” - He repeated "VAGUE!" which was the word I noted to myself and wasn't shared with anyone. The reason my responses started to be more clear to him were a result of him not implying with any sort of resolution from his end. This call and the above were part of several phone calls detailed here »
That was another demonstrative indication to the cyber surveillance in this case.
The above two instances of calls serve as an indication to the connection between those parties.
Ramy Gewida Sudden Defense to Builders Capital
Ramy Gewida’s (“Ramy Andraws”, another connected individual in the case and former friend) defense to Builders Capital while he was with me inside my car when I mentioned that I am intending to sue the company, his facial expressions changed and became worried, then asked in a defensive manner and verbiage “Did they not sign you on papers?” I did not understand at that time why he seemed to be worried and asked the question in a defensive worrying manner, but provided the events happened later on when the crimes started, that justifies his worriness.
Neural Abuse
Explained, demonstrated and evidenced in details previously in this article.
Because quite frankly, after being wrongfully terminated from Builders Capital and attempting to sue the company, I suddenly became unable to type on the keyboard or use the cursor on a computer anymore, the basic function of my job but also developed Schizophrenia, Bipolar, PTSD, Tinnitus, Epilepsy, Delusions, Hallucinations, Alzheimer, unable to carry on my daily activities normally, might as well tourettes, dementia, and who knows what else they will come up with as a false fabricated justification to cover up on their crimes.
During my employment with Builders Capital, I have sent thousands of emails with ease, in addition to other typing such as documentations and others as well as my personal life, and I don’t know how I was carrying on such simple task if I didn’t know how to type on the keyboard, the basic function of my job that I suddenly started to struggle with upon attempting to sue Builders Capital other than it being a Nazi criminal retaliation act through Neural torture by the company - that is also factoring the other aspects of the case.
This is another type of slavery and forcing the victim to share information such as these herein that they wouldn’t have shared in the first place if a window of legal proceedings were permitted initially, the practice of abusing powers wouldn’t have been part of the case, and that the authorities were doing their due diligence properly in investigating those crimes, the reports submitted and convicting those responsible for them.
The company did not engage in any form of neural abuse toward me until after my termination. This was because I was an essential employee who had contributed significantly to the company and had extensive knowledge of every tid-bit of the IT systems, some of which I built from scratch. If I were to be “neurally abused” that forms a disability as current, those systems would be at risk of not functioning correctly. That’s why they pressured me to lead a four-hour virtual training session, as mentioned earlier.”
They may call it mental illness crisis and their appearance as well as their hypocritic demeanor may complement such claim, just to negate the evidenced neural abuse and the other crimes they are behind.
Arguments
Remind me how come the symptoms are lessened when going inside a Faraday cage?
Have you seen a mental illness asymptomatic to no radio signals?
Have you seen a spiritual possession being ended with a Faraday Cage or was it a Bible?
Can you help me understand what are those pieces showing on my CT Scans?
Can you explain the sudden inability in using the keyboard and mouse properly shortly after my attempts to sue the company that did not exist prior?
And the sudden impose of Robert Trent facial expressions and traits as demonstrated here.
But let’s ignore the Frank Freed indirect threat implication through corrupt FBI agent that is explained in this video, in addition to the other threats, harassments, gang-stalking and so forth that are published in the other articles, in addition to the CT Scans that show the chips and the totality of the circumstances, and still call it a mental illness or a disgruntled employee.
Wonder how I wrote down these? in the same way demonstrated in this article, and while being on remedies. I do not know if I will be provided with the same remedies to be able to defend myself or will be able to afford them anymore in the event I got unlawfully arrested due to sharing these which is not fair and/or have to attend hearings in court, despite these remedies being not enough to combat the neural abuse.
A Notable Death Threat Through a Murder Crime
Although the below have been threaded previously in a separate article, but I wanted to highlight it once again here to deliver a better picture on the crimes. The threat implication explained below was delivered through the death of a former marketing employee at the company named “Simeon Minshew” (pictured below) that appears to be a murder.
The below demonstrates the extent of crafting and coupling several elements within the framework of the case to collectively represent a death threat relying on the accumulative interpretation of the victim to the conjugations of those elements.
Remarkably, I learnt about Simeon’s obituary on the same day of my termination from the company.
Simeon was a Marketing Employee at the company who had access to relatively sensitive data.
When Simeon was terminated, I noticed that he exported and took a “Complete Takeout” from the company’s Google Account that was being used for Marketing purposes which was in the size of 11GB approximately; I ultimately notified Salam Morcos who then notified Robert Trent; Salam later mentioned that Robert became irritated. This (the takeout of data) was one of the grounds that led to the murder of Simeon (Retaliation by Robert Trent and Salam Morcos in particular). I believe that Simeon’s death was announced as a normal Death, or perhaps suicide due to alleged Mental Illness.
A few months after my termination from Builders Capital and more specifically a few weeks after I started my contracted position at Ford Motor Company that was recently revealed as a covert CIA involvement in the case, Builders Capital hired two new employees in around June 2022 that their last name surprisingly is “Simeonova” that matched Simeon’s name. Below are the two hires that were announced through BIM Quote, a subsidiary of Builders Capital.
Coincidence? Of course, not.
Whether this is their actual last name or that’s what they go by and was crafted to represent the threat implication or did the company somehow searched and located two persons with that name and hired them but the intention of the threat implication remains valid.
Additionally, the last portion of the new hires’ last names comes as “Nova” that matches my newly established LLC at that time which is “Nova Gravity”, ultimately creating a strike of common name matches in the case.
It is not necessarily that these people are maliciously affiliated, it is the art of incorporating elements to work in the reported criminals’ favor to deliver the intended implications.
Arguments
What are the odds that I get notified by Simeon’s Death (or Murder to be more accurate) on the same exact day of my termination?
But also, Builders Capital hired the above-referenced employees with such a name match as described during one of the peak periods of the crimes while I was actively reporting the crimes and the threat implications to authorities.
And that LinkedIn algorithms displays their two new hires on the top of my LinkedIn feed upon logging in.
In addition to the other patterns of implications and the totality of circumstances.
Define complex methods of targeting and implications. Particularly, in the FBI’s understanding.
Notably, in a later date after Simeon’s termination while I was still employed with the company, Katherine Christofilis (the corporate attorney) told me “Simeon is worked-up from/about you”, I then asked her to clarify, she then said “he thinks you’re the reason for him to get terminated”; Katherine had then added about Simeon and said, “he is mentally ill.” - the same exact false allegation they are attributing against me to negate their responsibility in the crimes.
Conceptual Figure
If you analyze the events and the incidents thoroughly, you will find a significant connection of leading elements resulting in a trail, similar to the below chain where at least one element from each piece link in that chain is a common factor with another to form an endless trail - in a sense, with each piece link of the chain representing a specific event/incident.
Relevant Points
The idea behind sharing my professional experience herein is that demonstrating my achievements at work that proves the wrongful termination but also how come I was able to accomplish all these and out of a sudden I became disabled that I’m unable to type on the keyboard and use the mouse properly that extends to other functions throughout the day. But surprisingly, all disappear or at least lessens when I go inside a Faraday cage that isolates the signals.
Reinforcing my claims regarding unlawful and wrongful terminations, in addition to the wrongdoings and forced labor that the company engages in.
Proof of Settlement Proposals »
I attempted several times to resolve the matter through meditation but they are turned with unacknowledgement, ignored, and I'm still being targeted by them.
The below are email communications with some of the attorneys I reached out to in order to sue Builders Capital after my termination, in addition to the phone calls that are not listed herein.
Document: Explanation of Termination Event at Builders Capital »
Important Articles
The below two articles reinforces the information provided here. The rest of the articles that are equivalently important and listed at the bottom of this article.
Listen to my comments in the below video. The video specifically focuses on my interactions with Salam and addresses certain personal aspects of the case, reflecting the professional and personal connection in regard to the case, as discussed/referenced earlier. Although the video was published in 2023 and some elements might create a misleading impression of PTSD, the events and circumstances described are entirely genuine.
Video Preview Failed to Load? Click Here
Summary Video
The hour-long video provides a comprehensive timeline of the case's origins and key events occurred in sequence that were not previously shared in articles. Threats such as “Imagine a Children Museum” and “Can a Camera Record its Own Death?” and many others are delivered but little does the FBI know what implications to threats mean. Video Publish Year: 2024
Video preview failed to load? Click Here
Comments
During my employment, I showed loyalty to the company and dedication to my work. Understanding that finding an opportunity in the tech industry is not easy but at the same time I’m a human being who feels pain and understands what is right from wrong or whether they are being mistreated or not, and speaking up for my rights is what led to my wrongful termination but also the criminal retaliation until now. I also did not know that there was a much bigger case and an organized crime behind my employment and/or advantaging such employment until a couple of months after my termination.
The tangible evidence in this case is represented in the collective combination of all elements together that ranges from consistent patterns, discrepancies, and the placement of those key elements within the case context or framework in alignment with the timings of the reported events, in addition to certain artifacts that complement and reinforces the aforementioned such as logs, email communications, text messages, forensic exports, and so forth, as well as any attestations provided by witnesses.
How can the victim defend themselves if at any time faces a lawsuit based on these articles while at the same time being under neural abuse and the government is not arresting those responsible for the crimes? Is that justice?
And regardless of sharing these, I demand my rights from Builders Capital, its associated partners as well as the government agency, the FBI that those parties infiltrated and put in their pockets through bribery to provide me with full compensation and punitive damages up to the maximum amount allowed by the law.
You can’t push someone hard enough to publicize these and because you’re so strong that these may not affect you or maybe affects you a little bit, you come back and chase them and pursue charges, right?
In as much that I did not want to share such information; however, the share came in an effort to protect myself from the ongoing retaliation I am experiencing from the company and its corrupt leadership primarily through neural abuse that left me no choice but to publicize these information herein and in the other articles. Does it sound right to arrest or convict a victim who had no choice but to share this information under duress or better go after the parties whom are responsible for the crimes?
Despite that the FBI have failed several times to fulfill its duties in indicting the reported threat actors without attempting to obtain any piece of information or evidence; however, the publicized material herein along with the entailed analysis, explanations that are backed with screenshots, photos, videos, text messages, timestamps or email communications and/or any other shall collectively represent a valid tangible evidence for the obvious organized crime that obliges the agency in investigating the reported crimes immediately. The agency shall have no excuse to ignore, delay, deny and/or withdraw from the case.
Failure to fulfill such duty that the Bureau is fundamentally held upon shall constitute a direct Treason act and a clear malicious affiliation of the agency with the reported threat actors and their allies. Alleging the innocence of those criminals based on a cliche investigation opposes the included evidence, demonstrates non-transparency and an illicit act to defraud the law.
As previously mentioned, I’m certain that there are still some loyal officials within the agency. Perhaps this is an opportunity for the FBI to restore the public trust in the bureau.
Disclaimers
No party, either directly, indirectly and or through other party shall hold me accountable or liable for publishing any of the content herein, including but not limited to any attached or referenced material at any given date or time, or otherwise allege mental illness, conspiracy theory, or similar; for the reasons explained in this article, the previously shared articles and any referenced leading documents; or is the FBI advantaging malicious Private Sector partnerships to influence publications as such through deceptive means so they can have grounds of suing and indicting the victim in Court? And if so, this is called fraud. Does that satisfy the intent of the law?
I am publishing these after consuming every viable method of obtaining justice and while being under neural abuse that I had no choice but to publish them in hopes to rescue myself.
Any attempt of seizing or holding any of my documents, material and other personal belongings shall constitute an unlawful and harsh act to cover-up on the crimes and violation of my rights, while leaving the true threat actors off the leash.
ّ I also attempted to solve the matter through a settlement several times, with all leading to no where. Links to such attempts are referenced above in this article.
This information and material would have been available in court records and publicly accessible to anyone if they had been part of a court case, some of which are indeed included. Moreover, the law protects whistleblowers, whether private or public sector against retaliation.
All information herein and included in the other articles are provided in good faith and are believed to be accurate and to the best of my knowledge.
I reserve my right to retain any and all material and artifacts pertaining the reported crimes and illicit acts through possible grounds for litigation or criminal retaliation.
Any future updates of the information added in this article shall supersede the previous versions if any.
All other disclaimers added to documents through reference of leading documents and/or articles shall apply.
I reserve my right to free speech.
Case Articles
The FBI Is Behind Robb Elementary School Shooting & Other Shootings In The U.S.
Club Q Mass Shooting was motivated by a Mafia Syndicate that bought the FBI
Gang-Stalking: Implied Harassment at Church Through Corrupt FBI
Video: Transfer of Robert Trent's Facial Traits and Expressions Through Neural Abuse